When buying a car, safety is often a top priority for consumers. However, not all vehicles that appear sturdy and well-built perform well in crash tests. Below are seven cars that might look safe on the outside but have received disappointing ratings in safety evaluations. Be sure to keep these in mind when choosing your next vehicle.
1. Mitsubishi Mirage
The Mitsubishi Mirage has a reputation for being a budget-friendly option, but its safety ratings tell a different story. Despite its compact size and seemingly strong structure, this car has consistently scored poorly in crash tests conducted by organizations like the IIHS.
With a lack of advanced safety features and subpar crash protection, the Mirage may not offer the reassurance you expect from a new car. Buyers need to weigh the cost savings against potential safety concerns before making a decision.
2. Fiat 500
The Fiat 500 is often praised for its quirky design and urban maneuverability, but safety is a different matter. This small car performs poorly in frontal and side crash tests, raising alarms about occupant protection.
Additionally, the Fiat 500 lacks basic safety features that are now standard in many competing models. If you’re considering this vehicle, be aware that its stylish looks might not translate to real-world safety performance.
3. Nissan Versa
The Nissan Versa is marketed as an affordable sedan, but its crash test results are less than reassuring. While it may appear robust, it has received low scores for both frontal and side impact safety.
Moreover, its safety technology is limited compared to rivals in the same segment. Buyers should approach the Versa with caution, as it may not provide the level of protection expected from a modern vehicle.
4. Chevrolet Spark
The Chevrolet Spark is another subcompact car that looks deceptively safe. Its small stature and light weight contribute to a poor showing in crash test ratings, particularly in side-impact collisions.
Although it offers great fuel efficiency, the Spark’s lack of advanced safety features and inadequate crash protection are significant drawbacks. Potential buyers should consider these aspects carefully.
5. Kia Rio
The Kia Rio may have a sleek exterior, but its performance in safety tests is concerning. While it offers a comfortable ride, the Rio has shown vulnerabilities in crash simulations, particularly when it comes to passenger safety during a collision.
With minimal standard safety technologies, this car falls short of what many consumers expect. Anyone considering the Rio should prioritize safety over style.
6. Hyundai Accent
The Hyundai Accent is often lauded for its value, but safety ratings reveal a different story. Despite its attractive design, this small car has earned low marks for crash protection, particularly regarding rear impact safety.
In addition, the Accent lacks several key advanced safety features, making it less competitive in today’s market. Buyers should think twice about how much they value safety in their vehicle choice.
7. Toyota Yaris
The Toyota Yaris is known for its reliability, but its safety performance raises eyebrows. While it may appear sturdy, crash tests have shown that the Yaris does not provide adequate protection in various scenarios, especially in side impacts.
Moreover, the absence of modern safety aids can leave drivers feeling vulnerable. Those considering the Yaris should take these safety concerns into account before committing to a purchase.
Choosing a car is a significant decision, and safety should be at the forefront. Always research crash test ratings and consider how a vehicle’s features align with your safety expectations. Don’t let attractive designs cloud your judgment—make an informed choice for your well-being on the road.
More from Steel Horse Rides: