The Army is treating 2026 as a make-or-break year for its Next Generation Command and Control system, a software driven architecture meant to knit sensors, shooters, and decision makers into a single, data centric network. Success or failure will shape how the service fights in contested theaters, from Europe to the Indo Pacific, and will influence joint concepts that depend on faster, more resilient command decisions. The coming year will test not only new technology, but also whether the Army can reorganize, fund, and secure a radically different way of commanding forces at scale.
The stakes for Next Gen C2 in a rapidly changing battlespace
Army leaders are betting that Next Gen C2 will compress the time it takes to sense a threat, decide on a response, and deliver effects, turning what used to be minutes of staff work into seconds of machine assisted action. The effort is framed as a response to adversaries that are fielding long range fires, electronic warfare, and cyber tools designed to blind and fragment U.S. formations before they can coordinate. In that environment, a legacy patchwork of radios, chat tools, and manual targeting processes is seen as too slow and too fragile to survive.
One major Army initiative that is expected to accelerate in 2026 is the formal Next Generation Command and Control (NGC2) enterprise, which aims to replace stovepiped systems with a common data layer and modular applications that can be updated quickly instead of waiting on hardware refresh cycles. Reporting on what comes next for the Army’s ambitious Next Gen C2 effort describes 2026 as a year of intensive experimentation, with multiple events planned to vet new tech before a single culminating exercise brings the pieces together in a realistic scenario, underscoring how central NGC2 has become to the Army’s future concept of operations.
Billions on the line in the 2026 budget
The scale of the Army’s financial commitment signals that Next Gen C2 is not a side project, but a core modernization pillar. For fiscal 2026, the Army plans to spend roughly $3B on next generation command and control, a funding line that supports the broader Next Generation Comm and control portfolio and the shift to agile, software based architectures. That level of investment places NGC2 alongside long range fires and air and missile defense as one of the most heavily resourced modernization priorities, and it gives program offices room to iterate rather than lock into a single, monolithic solution.
Budget documents and supporting analysis indicate that this money is intended to underwrite cloud enabled mission command tools, data fabric services, and the infrastructure needed to connect tactical formations to enterprise networks without overwhelming bandwidth. The Army’s decision to channel roughly $3B into Next Generation Comm capabilities in a single fiscal year also reflects a belief that software centric C2 can be fielded and improved faster than traditional hardware programs, provided that acquisition rules and testing regimes keep pace with the technology.
From experiments to division scale at Project Convergence
After several years of smaller demonstrations, the Army is now pushing Next Gen C2 into larger formations to prove it can work at the scale of real operations. The service plans to scale the system to an entire division by the next iteration of Project Convergence, turning what had been a series of limited experiments into a full up test of how a large formation fights when every sensor and shooter is tied into a common network. That shift from battalion or brigade pilots to division level employment is intended to surface integration problems that only appear when thousands of users and dozens of mission threads are active at once.
Project Convergence has become the Army’s primary venue for stress testing new command and control concepts against realistic threats, including contested communications and joint fires. By committing to bring a division sized slice of the force into the next event, The Army is effectively putting Next Gen C2 on trial in front of joint partners and senior leaders, who will be watching to see whether the system can actually shorten kill chains and improve survivability rather than simply adding more screens to already overloaded command posts.
From minutes to seconds on the tactical edge
At the soldier level, the promise of Next Gen C2 is less about abstract architectures and more about shaving precious time off life or death decisions. The U.S. Army is testing a new battlefield communication system that is intended to move targeting and situational awareness updates from minutes to seconds, giving American troops a clearer picture of threats and friendly positions before they crest a hill or enter a city block. That kind of latency reduction depends on automating data flows that are still handled manually in many units, such as copying coordinates between chat windows and fire control systems.
Demonstrations of this new battlefield communication approach show how sensor feeds, blue force tracking, and fire missions can be fused into a single interface that updates in near real time, rather than forcing soldiers to reconcile multiple, lagging displays. For commanders, the same tools promise a more accurate common operational picture that can be shared across echelons, reducing the risk of fratricide and enabling faster synchronization of maneuver, fires, and electronic effects, all of which are central goals of the broader Next Gen C2 push.
Unified Network Plan 2.0 and the cybersecurity backbone
None of the Army’s command and control ambitions are possible without a network that can move data securely across domains, which is why cybersecurity sits at the heart of the service’s planning. With the Army Unified Network Plan 2.0, released as an update to its earlier roadmap, the service is setting a course to support multidomain operations while aligning with joint and Department of Defense efforts. The plan emphasizes zero trust principles, identity management, and continuous monitoring as baseline requirements rather than add ons, reflecting a recognition that adversaries will target the network as aggressively as any physical asset.
Alongside the strategy document, the Army has begun implementing a 2.0 update of the Unified Network Plan that targets optimizing the network for data centric operations, streamlining data flows, and transitioning to new capabilities while phasing out legacy systems. This phase focuses on making sure that NGC2 applications can ride on a resilient, software defined transport layer that can reroute traffic around jamming or outages, and that data is tagged and managed in ways that allow artificial intelligence tools to operate without creating new vulnerabilities.
The 30 month sprint and the pressure of timelines
To translate strategy into fielded capability, the Army has set an aggressive deployment schedule that compresses what was once a multi year roadmap. The U.S. Army is embarking on a bold 30 month sprint to overhaul its command and control systems across all 19 divisions, a timeline that would push Next Gen C2 capabilities into every major tactical formation far faster than traditional acquisition cycles. Leaders argue that this pace is necessary to keep up with adversaries that are iterating quickly on their own kill chain and targeting systems.
What was initially forecast to take four to five years has been challenged to a 30 month sprint by the Army’s senior leadership, a shift that has forced program managers and network integrators to rethink how they field and support software at scale. Officials involved in the effort have described the sprint as a forcing function that compels the service to adopt more agile development practices, even as they acknowledge the risk that units could receive immature tools if testing and training cannot keep up with the compressed schedule.
AI, data fabrics, and the race for decision advantage
Beyond connecting radios and chat tools, Next Gen C2 is being built as a platform for artificial intelligence and machine learning that can help commanders sift through torrents of data. Preparing for AI The ultimate goal of NGC2 is to give commanders the ability to make decisions faster, with artificial intelligence and machine learning tools operating on top of a common integration layer that ingests sensor feeds, intelligence reports, and logistics data. Program leaders describe this as a “chicken and egg” problem, where the Army must build the data fabric and integration layer even as it experiments with the algorithms that will ride on top.
The Army is also looking to space based capabilities to feed that data fabric, recognizing that satellites can provide resilient communications paths and global sensing that terrestrial networks cannot match. In a recent space focused brief, one of the Top Stories highlighted how China Caps Record Year for Orbital Launches, with China conducting 92 orbital launches, a figure that underscores the pace at which potential adversaries are expanding their own space based sensing and communications. Against that backdrop, the U.S. Army is looking at how to better use space based capabilities for data processing in military operations, tying orbital assets into the same NGC2 architecture that connects ground units.
Reorganizing PEO C3N and the Army Transformation Initiative
Technology alone will not deliver Next Gen C2, so the Army is reshaping its acquisition and program management structures to match the new architecture. Through NGC2, the Army is transforming not only technology, but also processes in requirements, resourcing, acquisition, and sustainment, a shift reflected in a major reorganization for PEO C3N that is intended to better support the next generation command and control approach. The reorganization is designed to keep stakeholders engaged, focused, and mission ready as they manage a portfolio that spans radios, mission command applications, and network services.
These changes are nested inside a broader Army Transformation Initiative, or ATI, that Secretary Driscoll and GEN George rolled out to create a leaner force and modernize the Army’s C2 capabilities and architecture. ATI frames NGC2 as a central element of a larger push to streamline headquarters, reduce redundant systems, and ensure that every echelon can plug into a common command and control backbone, rather than maintaining separate, incompatible networks that complicate joint operations.
2026: experiments, integration, and the path to fielding
All of these strands converge in 2026, which Army planners describe as a decisive period for proving that Next Gen C2 can move from concept to operational reality. One of the Army goals for 2026 is to test an NGC2 architecture in a series of events that allow units to experiment with new tech before a single culminating exercise, an approach meant to surface integration issues early and avoid a high profile failure in front of senior leaders. Those events will test not only software and hardware, but also new tactics, techniques, and procedures for how staffs plan and fight when information flows more freely.
One major Army initiative that is expected to pick up speed in 2026 is the Next Generation Command and Control enterprise itself, which will be judged on whether it can deliver measurable improvements in decision speed, survivability, and lethality across the force. If the experiments and the culminating exercise show that NGC2 can withstand cyber and electronic attack while still giving commanders a clearer, faster picture of the fight, the Army will have strong justification for its multibillion dollar bet; if not, 2026 could mark the moment when the service is forced to recalibrate its most ambitious command and control overhaul in decades.
More from Wilder Media Group: