Car buyers are walking into showrooms expecting a straight deal and instead finding a maze of add-ons, surprise fees, and pressure tactics that feel more like a game than a purchase. As prices, interest costs, and regulations all shift at once, shoppers say the tricks are getting more creative, not less. The result is a widening gap between what customers think they agreed to and what ends up on the contract.
Behind the scenes, dealers are juggling heavy inventory, tighter rules, and fierce competition, and some are responding by pushing the limits of what they can get away with. That tension is fueling a wave of frustration, online venting, and formal complaints, and it is also giving prepared buyers more leverage than they have had in years.
The new “games” buyers are seeing on the showroom floor
One of the clearest signs of consumer frustration is how blunt shoppers have become when they talk about dealerships. On a widely shared thread in the r/carbuying community, a user posting under the name Coach_Seven vented about “unnecessary games,” with another commenter joking about leaving a “morning after dump” in the dealership restroom with the salesperson’s card on the floor as payback, a story captured in a post that begins with the word Every. The language is crude, but the sentiment is familiar: buyers feel they are being toyed with, whether it is a lowball trade offer that suddenly improves when they stand up to leave or a “today only” discount that magically reappears a week later.
Industry voices are noticing the same pattern from the other side of the desk. In a widely circulated LinkedIn post that opens with the word Nov, physician and entrepreneur Waseem Ghannam argued that “Car dealerships will continue to F around and not find out so long as a captured congress allows for it,” tying the persistence of these tactics to weak federal oversight. He framed the problem in the same breath as “Payments,” “Consumer Finance,” “Healthcare,” and “Plant Science,” suggesting that opaque pricing and fine-print traps are not just a car lot issue but part of a broader culture of financial gamesmanship.
Why the pressure is rising just as buyers gain leverage
Part of what makes the current moment so volatile is that the market is finally tilting back toward shoppers. Analysts tracking the 2026 landscape note that the automotive market now “favors well-prepared buyers” after years of shortages, with advice that buyers should focus negotiations on the price of the vehicle rather than the interest rate, a point laid out in guidance on how to negotiate a car purchase that begins with the word Jan. At the same time, video market updates describe dealers as “drowning in inventory,” with one breakdown of 2026 stock noting that the vehicles on its list all share one thing, there are a lot of them, a reality highlighted in a segment that also references the month Jan.
Yet even as buyers gain bargaining power, the cost of getting a car financed remains painful. Analysts point out that “High interest rates added thousands of dollars to the cost of buying a car over the last two years,” and that even as rates begin to ease, shoppers are still paying more over the life of a loan, a trend explained in a consumer piece that opens with the word High. That squeeze on monthly payments gives sales staff a powerful lever: they can keep the focus on “what can you afford per month” while stretching terms, padding interest, or slipping in extras that make the total cost far higher than the sticker suggests.
Regulators crack down while dealers push back
Regulators have not ignored the complaints. The Federal Trade Commission created The Combating Auto Retail Scams initiative, known as the CARS Rule, to target bait-and-switch pricing, junk fees, and misleading add-ons, a framework described in detail in an analysis of Combating Auto Retail. Although that federal Rule has been sidelined in court, state attorneys general are following their own procedural playbook, signaling that the underlying push to rein in deceptive practices is not going away.
Some dealers are bristling at that scrutiny. A report on a group of Dealerships in Texas described how the owner of three stores vowed to fight complaints from the FTC, the Federal Trade Commission, after allegations that staff were charging higher markups and add-on costs to Black and Latino buyers. Industry newsletters have also noted that when the FTC CARS Rule was struck down by the Fifth Circuit, California responded by enacting its own version, with one analysis explaining that “When the FTC CARS rule got struck down by the Fifth Circuit, California enacted its own version,” a move that is expected to cost dealers millions and reshape the customer experience, as detailed in a piece that begins with the word Nov.
States step in with their own rules and complaint paths
With the federal CARS Rule tied up, states are filling the gap. Legal analysts note that The California CARS Act mirrors key parts of the FTC Rule, especially around add-on products and services, requiring that any extras be clearly disclosed and genuinely beneficial to the buyer, a structure described in a review of California CARS Act. That same analysis underscores that auto retail remains a priority under the current administration, even as federal litigation drags on.
Canada offers a glimpse of how more structured oversight can work in practice. In Alberta, all tips and concerns about an automotive business or salesperson go through AMVIC, the Alberta Motor Vehicle Industry Council, which lays out a clear complaint process for consumers. The same organization explains that if you have a concern or question about a dealer, you can file a formal report with AMVIC, which has been delegated authority since 2002 to enforce provincial rules, a role spelled out in guidance that begins with the word All. In British Columbia, the VSA, or Vehicle Sales Authority, publishes “Consumer Protection Facts” and a “Find Help For Your Issue” section that walks buyers through dispute resolution and access to the Consumer Compensation Fund, tools detailed in a resource that uses the phrases Consumer Protection Facts and “Learn about resolving issues.”
How dealers are adapting behind the scenes
Even as some stores double down on old-school tactics, others are quietly retooling. Trade publications have been warning for years that the “used game is shifting,” urging Dealers to get their digital strategy in order and rethink how they source and price pre-owned inventory, a message captured in a piece that highlights the word Jul and stresses that Dealers who want to stay in the game need new approaches. That shift is accelerating as online marketplaces, instant trade-in offers, and transparent pricing tools make it harder to hide the ball on what a car is really worth.
At the same time, regulatory pressure is forcing management teams to scrutinize every step of the sales process. Analysts tracking federal and state enforcement note that even with the CARS Rule sidelined, the FTC is still pursuing cases and state attorneys general are still filing actions, a pattern described in detail in a breakdown of how the CARS Rule playbook lives on. Some compliance consultants now advise dealers to treat every menu presentation, every add-on pitch, and every financing conversation as if the strictest version of the rules already applied, not because they suddenly became altruists, but because the cost of getting caught is rising.
More from Wilder Media Group: