Somewhere in England, a learner driver has sat the driving theory test 128 times and failed every single one. At £23 per attempt, that adds up to £2,944 in fees alone, nearly £3,000 spent without ever clearing the first hurdle toward a full licence.
The figure, drawn from Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency data first reported by the BBC in November 2025, has reignited a long-running argument: should there be a cap on how many times someone can retake the theory exam?
What the theory test actually involves
Before any learner in Great Britain can book a practical driving exam, they must pass the theory test. It consists of two parts: a multiple-choice section covering the Highway Code, road signs and traffic law, and a hazard perception test that requires candidates to spot developing dangers in video clips. The pass mark is 43 out of 50 on the multiple choice and 44 out of 75 on hazard perception. A pass certificate is valid for two years.
The test is not designed to be easy. DVSA statistics show the car theory test pass rate has hovered around 47% in recent reporting periods, meaning more than half of all candidates fail on any given attempt. That baseline difficulty makes 128 consecutive failures extraordinary, but it also underscores that struggling with the exam is far from rare.
How £2,944 adds up
Each theory test attempt costs £23, a fee that has remained unchanged since 2014. For most learners, the total outlay is modest: one or two sittings and they move on. But the system places no limit on retakes, and for a small number of candidates, costs spiral.
The 128-attempt record holder is the most extreme example, but they are not alone. DVSA data released alongside the record showed multiple candidates with dozens of failed attempts, and a 2016 release highlighted a Liverpool man who finally passed his theory test on his 39th try, as reported by This Is Money. In that earlier batch, 22 candidates had collectively racked up more than 700 failed tests between them.
The financial burden falls unevenly. A candidate with limited income who fails repeatedly faces a compounding cost that wealthier learners can absorb more easily, raising questions about whether unlimited retakes create an uneven playing field rather than a fair one.
The case for a cap on retakes
The Driving Instructors Association raised concerns about unlimited retakes as far back as 2016, questioning in a BBC report whether candidates should be able to sit the test so many times. The argument is straightforward: if someone has failed more than, say, 20 or 30 times, the test is doing its job by identifying a persistent knowledge gap, and further attempts without structured intervention are unlikely to produce a different result.
Road safety campaigners have echoed that concern. The theory test exists to keep drivers who do not understand basic road rules from progressing to unsupervised driving. When a candidate treats it as a lottery, booking attempt after attempt without changing their preparation, the exam becomes a revenue loop rather than a safety filter, a point raised in analysis by Drive.
As of early 2026, the DVSA has not announced any plans to introduce a retake cap. The agency’s position, stated through former chief examiner Lesley Young, remains that test results reflect performance on the day and that candidates should book only when they feel properly prepared.
The case against a cap
Not everyone agrees that limiting retakes is the answer. Disability advocates have pointed out that some candidates with dyslexia, learning difficulties or test anxiety may need significantly more attempts through no fault of their effort or intelligence. A blanket cap could disproportionately exclude people who are capable drivers but poor exam-takers.
There is also a practical argument: the theory test is self-funding through candidate fees, and the DVSA has little financial incentive to turn people away. Restricting access could push some learners toward driving without a licence, a worse outcome for road safety than a slow path to passing.
What the reaction reveals
The story predictably went viral. Social media users turned the anonymous learner into a punchline, with one widely shared post from a Cardiff driving school joking that the Highway Code probably knows the candidate by name. Comment threads filled with suggestions that the person should stick to buses.
But beneath the jokes, the public response split along familiar lines. Some admired the persistence. Others argued that 128 failures is evidence someone should never be allowed behind a wheel. A few asked the question that the data cannot answer: does this person have a learning disability, a language barrier, or some other factor that the raw numbers do not capture? The DVSA’s statistics are anonymized, so the candidate’s circumstances remain unknown.
What would actually help
Instructors who work with repeat failers say the real gap is not in the test itself but in preparation. The DVSA offers a free practice test on its website, and the official theory test revision materials are widely available. Yet many candidates book the exam without systematic study, relying on familiarity from previous attempts rather than targeted review of weak areas.
A middle path between unlimited retakes and a hard cap might involve mandatory waiting periods that increase after a set number of failures, or a requirement to complete a structured preparation course before rebooking after, say, 10 failed attempts. Neither option is currently DVSA policy, but both have been floated in industry discussions as ways to protect candidates from wasting money while preserving access.
For now, the 128-attempt record stands as both a testament to one person’s refusal to quit and a signal that the system around them offered no off-ramp. Whether that changes may depend on whether policymakers see the story as a quirky outlier or a symptom of something that needs fixing.
More from Wilder Media Group: