Reports that a dealership service manager allegedly treated customer vehicles like personal toys, while a whistleblower was told to stay quiet, have crystallized a growing anxiety among car owners. Hidden dashcams, telematics data and social media posts are now exposing what happens after drivers hand over their keys, and the picture is not flattering for an industry that trades on trust.
The accusations land in a climate where customers already suspect that some repair shops and dealers see their cars as an invitation for joy rides, not just routine service. From high speed blasts on public roads to employees using vehicles for days at a time, the pattern points to a cultural problem that goes far beyond one manager with what critics describe as a “massive ego.”
Alleged joy rides and a culture of looking the other way
The latest controversy centers on claims that a dealership service manager routinely took customer cars out for unnecessary drives, not to diagnose problems but to indulge himself, while a subordinate who objected was allegedly instructed to stay silent. The account, shared in detail in an online post, describes a pattern of behavior that critics say reflects a Massive sense of entitlement inside the service lane, where customer consent and safety are treated as afterthoughts rather than non negotiable boundaries. The whistleblower’s claim that they were told “to be quiet about it” underscores how internal pressure can suppress complaints long before they reach regulators or the public.
Similar stories have surfaced across the country, suggesting this is not an isolated lapse. In one case, a repair shop worker was recorded taking a customer’s car on an extended drive and, according to the customer’s account, did not even realize the vehicle had already been sold, using it for roughly two weeks before anyone caught on, a scenario that came to light through a widely shared repair video. In another incident, a technician at a dealership was seen on camera taking an SUV out while the owner was away, a clip that prompted calls for the store’s leadership to “learn a lesson” even after the worker was fired, as viewers of a separate SUV recording noted.
Dashcams, whistleblowers and the limits of dealership assurances
Customers are increasingly turning to their own technology to verify what happens to their vehicles once they leave the lot. In Washington, a driver who left his car for repairs discovered through his dashcam that a mechanic took it on a high speed run that hit roughly 100 mph, an episode that unfolded in Washington after the customer said he was being ignored. The shop’s internal messages, which referenced “Today, he threatened to go to the media if we did not give him his money,” captured how management sometimes frames these complaints as public relations problems rather than safety failures. Another owner in the same state said his dashcam caught a worker on a joy ride that left him “shocked,” a moment preserved in a separate mechanic clip that has circulated widely among drivers who now routinely check their footage after service visits.
Local investigative teams are also documenting how these disputes play out once customers confront dealerships. In one case, a man who left his car for service later saw it being driven around for what he described as hours, prompting a televised segment on Unauthorized rides that urged viewers to monitor their own vehicles. In another investigation, a dealership’s general manager insisted that the store “takes customer concerns extremely seriously” and that technicians only drive vehicles when needed, a defense delivered as part of an Team Fair Oaks segment that contrasted sharply with dashcam evidence showing a car being taken out repeatedly. The gap between polished assurances and what cameras record is fueling calls for clearer written policies, automatic trip logs and real consequences when staff treat customer property as their own.
Retaliation risks and the push for better oversight
Behind many of these revelations are employees who say they tried to raise concerns internally and paid a price for it. At one Hyundai store, a fired worker who alleged that documents were forged in the finance office filed a whistleblower lawsuit against the dealership, arguing that he was terminated after objecting to what he believed were improper practices, according to a complaint that identifies the business as a Hyundai franchise and references AUTOMOTIVE NEWS FILE materials. While that case centers on alleged forgery rather than test drives, it illustrates how power imbalances inside dealerships can discourage staff from challenging questionable behavior, whether it involves paperwork or the way customer vehicles are handled.
Technology that was once reserved for commercial fleets is now being pitched as a way for both businesses and consumers to close that accountability gap. Telematics systems that track location, speed and driver behavior can flag unauthorized trips and aggressive driving before they lead to crashes, a capability that providers say helps You protect vehicles against misuse as well as cargo theft. For individual owners, inexpensive plug in GPS devices and always on dashcams now serve as silent witnesses, recording every mile a service department racks up. As more customers share that footage online, the industry is learning that what happens on a “quick test drive” rarely stays in the service bay, and that the cost of ignoring whistleblowers can be far higher than the price of fixing a car the right way the first time.
More from Wilder Media Group: