Car buyers are swapping horror stories about “mandatory” extras that quietly add thousands to the price of a new ride, from paint sealants to mystery security packages. In a market where Prices for new cars in America are already about $6,400 higher than just a couple of years ago, those padded line items can turn a tight budget into a blown one. Drivers are now pushing back, comparing notes online, and discovering that a lot of what is sold as non‑negotiable is actually very optional.
Behind the scenes, regulators and state lawmakers are also tightening the screws on how dealers pitch and price add‑ons, even as some rules get challenged in court. That mix of consumer backlash, legal pressure, and old‑school sales tactics is reshaping what happens in the finance office, and it is giving shoppers more leverage than many realize.
Sticker shock in a $6,400 world
Walk into a showroom today and the starting price is already a gut punch before the extras even show up. Analysts report that Prices for new cars in America have climbed by roughly $6,400 compared with where they sat a year or two ago, a jump that hits monthly payments and household budgets hard. Layer dealer add‑ons on top of that, and the “out the door” number can feel completely disconnected from the advertised price that pulled someone onto the lot in the first place.
That gap between the online listing and the contract is exactly where many of the most controversial extras live. Buyers describe being quoted a fair price on a 2025 compact SUV, only to find a separate addendum sheet with paint protection, nitrogen tires, and a “pro pack” that together rival the cost of a used car. In social media groups, shoppers like Mike Conner complain that Dealers are stacking on “other crap for $3‑8,000,” turning what should be a straightforward purchase into a negotiation over every bolt‑on line item.
What dealer add‑ons actually are
Part of the confusion is that “add‑on” sounds harmless, like a floor mat upgrade, when it often means a whole menu of products that quietly swell the bottom line. Legal guides spell out that What Are Dealer Add‑Ons can include extended warranties, VIN etching, fabric or paint protection, alarm systems, and Tire and wheel packages that a Dealer folds into the deal after the shopper is already emotionally attached to the car. These extras are usually pitched in the finance office, where the buyer is signing a stack of forms and may not realize how much each box they initial is costing.
Regulators note that Car dealerships offer buyers lots of add‑ons, from service or maintenance contracts to special car paint coatings, that can add up to hundreds or thousands of dollars and sometimes never get used before the vehicle is driven off the lot, if ever. Consumer advocates warn that some of these products are legitimate but overpriced, while others provide little real value compared with what a driver could get from an independent mechanic or their own insurance. The key is that they are optional, even when they are bundled to look like part of the vehicle itself.
“Mandatory” add‑ons and the myth of no choice
Despite that, many buyers are told flat out that certain extras are non‑negotiable. In one North Texas thread, a shopper asked if there was any way around the “mandatory” dealer add‑ons on a popular truck, only to be met with blunt advice from a veteran commenter who said Nothing is mandatory. The same user pointed out that If the car is in high demand the dealership will not mind losing one sale over those add‑ons because they know another buyer will show up, which is exactly why shoppers feel so cornered.
Consumer law resources back up the idea that drivers have more power than they are being told. One legal explainer on dealer fraud stresses in its Key Takeaways that Dealerships cannot force someone to pay for unwanted add‑ons like pinstriping, and that a buyer can negotiate or simply find another dealer if the pressure gets too intense. Another community of frustrated shoppers on r/carbuying goes further, with one widely shared post insisting that it is illegal to force a customer to buy an add‑on if they do not want it and urging people to walk away Even if the dealership claims the add‑on is already installed and cannot be removed.
How dealers use addendum stickers and high‑pressure scripts
On the ground, the sales choreography is often the same. A buyer spots a reasonable price on a window sticker, only to notice a second sheet taped nearby listing a “market adjustment” and a handful of extras. Longtime observers warn that Typically it is the higher volume dealers in high traffic areas that shoppers need to be careful with, because They will add frivolous inexpensive items like door edge guards or nitrogen and then mark them up heavily on the addendum. By the time the customer sits down with the finance manager, those extras are treated as baked in.
Social media is full of clips of finance managers insisting that markups and packages are just “how it is now.” In one viral video, a creator looks straight into the camera and says they do not know who needs to hear this but you do not need to pay markup on your next car, adding that they do not care what the dealership says, you can refuse and shop elsewhere, a message that has been shared widely on TikTok. In local Facebook groups, members trade photos of addendum stickers as cautionary tales, with one thread warning that Typically these sheets are where the real profit hides and urging buyers to treat them as a starting point for negotiation, not a verdict.
What the law actually says about unwanted extras
Behind the viral rants is a fairly clear legal baseline. Federal consumer guidance spells out that Car dealerships cannot charge buyers for add‑ons they do not want, and that shoppers should read the sales contract carefully and be ready to negotiate with the dealer or walk away if something looks off. The same guidance highlights a case where Even worse, Asbury Automotive illegally charged Black and Latino car buyers hundreds of dollars more for the same add‑ons than other customers, a reminder that these products are not just a budgeting issue but also a civil rights concern when they are targeted unfairly.
Regulators have tried to tighten the rules further through the FTC CARS Rule, which set new requirements on vehicle sales and spelled out a list of Prohibited Misrepresentations around pricing and extras. Under that framework, the FTC made it a violation of the Rule to misstate the cost or benefit of add‑ons and required clear disclosure of the Offering Price, Total Payment, and any recurring charges tied to software or subscriptions, as detailed in the FTC summary. Although a later court decision vacated that specific CARS framework, legal analysts note that the underlying bans on misrepresenting the benefit of add‑on products, selling products with “no benefit,” and charging for items without consumer consent remain central to enforcement priorities, as explained in a Feb briefing.
State crackdowns, from California’s CARS Act to local enforcement
With the federal picture in flux, states are stepping in. The New California CARS Act, formally titled the new California Combating Auto Retail Scams Act, will constitute a new title within The California CARS Act section of the state Civil Code and is designed to clamp down on deceptive practices around any add‑on product or service. A detailed overview of its Applicability explains that the law will cover a wide range of retail vehicle transactions and require clearer disclosures whenever a dealer sells an extra product that is not necessary for the vehicle to function, as outlined in the Civil Code summary.
California Governor Signs California CARS Act into Law, with commentator M. Ronald McMahan, Jr. noting that On October 6, 2025, California governor Gavin Ne signed the measure and that it specifically targets junk fees like oil changes for electric vehicles that obviously provide no benefit. National law firms are telling auto clients that These enforcement trends suggest that dealers should consider reviewing and updating sales policies and procedures, as noted in one alert that urges businesses to work with counsel to stay ahead of state‑level crackdowns, a point emphasized in an Apr briefing. For shoppers, that means more backup if a dealer tries to slip in a service that is clearly useless for their specific car.
Federal rules on “no benefit” products and why wording matters
Even with the CARS Rule’s legal status complicated, its language is still shaping how dealers think about extras. A compliance analysis of the FTC CARS framework notes that on the topic of add‑ons, dealers may not charge buyers for “add‑ons that do not provide a benefit,” and it lists Examples of such add‑ons that would be banned, like nitrogen in tires that are already filled with air at no extra cost or protection plans that duplicate existing coverage. That same guidance stresses that the initial disclosure must clearly separate the price of the vehicle from any optional products, a point that consumer lawyers are now using as a benchmark for fair dealing, as explained in a Dec analysis.
Consumer advocates also point shoppers back to basic contract hygiene. Official guidance urges buyers to Read the sales contract and any financing documents line by line, to make sure every add‑on is something they actually agreed to, and to be ready to negotiate with the dealer or leave if the numbers do not match what was promised, advice laid out in an FTC alert. That might sound obvious, but in a finance office where the printer is spitting out forms and the salesperson is talking about monthly payments, it is exactly the step that gets skipped.
Which extras are junk, which are useful, and how to say no
Not every add‑on is a scam, and some can be worth it at the right price. A dealer‑side explainer on Dealer Add‑Ons Explained, Which Extras Are Worth Paying For points out that Extended Warranties are one of the most common upsells and can make sense for drivers who plan to keep a vehicle well past the factory coverage, especially on complex models loaded with electronics. At the same time, consumer‑oriented guides warn that many of these warranties are heavily marked up and that similar coverage can often be bought later from third parties for less, a trade‑off that shoppers need to weigh carefully, as discussed in the Sep breakdown.
Consumer checklists try to simplify the decision. One “Quick take” table on dealer extras lays out each Add‑on, the suggested Default move, a Good price target, and a Better alternative, and it bluntly reminds shoppers that You can say no and even suggests telling the salesperson up front, “No add‑ons,” to set expectations, advice captured in a Quick guide. Another consumer‑facing app explains that Are You Allowed to Decline Dealer Add‑Ons is not really a question at all, since the answer is Yes, and notes that Many buyers feel pressured into saying yes when they could simply refuse or ask the dealer to include the product at no charge, a point made in an Are You Allowed explainer.
Drivers are organizing, and dealers are being forced to adjust
What is changing the dynamic is that buyers are no longer walking into showrooms alone. Online communities like r/carbuying are full of pinned posts telling shoppers to stop paying for unwanted extras, with one widely shared thread reminding readers that it is illegal to force a customer to buy an add‑on if they do not want it and encouraging them to start reporting shady dealerships, a stance captured in an Aug discussion. Another Reddit thread from North Texas hammers home that Nothing is mandatory and advises shoppers to widen their search radius to dealers that deliver if local stores refuse to budge, a strategy laid out in an Jun thread.
More from Wilder Media Group: