Elon Musk flipped a switch this month and suddenly a wave of Tesla owners, myself included, woke up to find Full Self-Driving (Supervised) sitting in our cars like a surprise software stocking stuffer. The result is that I have been treating every errand, coffee run, and “forgot the milk again” dash as an excuse to let the car do the work while I hover over the wheel like a nervous driving instructor with a caffeine habit. It feels like a gift, but it is also a test, and I am determined to squeeze every mile of insight out of it.
How Tesla Turned My Commute Into a Software Trial
The magic moment did not arrive with a bow, it arrived with a notification. Tesla pushed out a message explaining that a “Your Full Self-Driving (Supervised) Trial” was now active on my car, a limited-time invitation to try the company’s most ambitious driver assistance package without paying up front. The wording was classic Tesla, a mix of tech swagger and legal caution, and it framed the whole thing as a chance to experience “Your Full Self” of automated driving while still reminding me that this is a supervised trial, not a teleportation device. That same phrasing, right down to the capital letters in “Your Full Self, Driving, Supervised, Trial,” has been circulating in Tesla’s outreach to owners, underscoring that this is a coordinated push rather than a random perk for a lucky few, as reflected in the company’s recent FSD free trials rollout.
From the driver’s seat, the effect is immediate. My daily slog through left turns, stale traffic lights, and that one intersection where nobody understands how four-way stops work has turned into a rolling experiment in human-machine trust. I tap the stalk, the steering wheel icon glows, and suddenly the car is threading its way through city streets while I sit there, hands hovering, ready to intervene but secretly hoping I will not have to. The trial framing matters: it nudges me to use the system constantly, to see what it can handle and where it stumbles, because I know the clock is ticking on this free taste of the future.
The Cybertruck Owners Who Hit the FSD Jackpot
If my trial feels like a generous sample platter, some owners are getting the full buffet. Tesla has been offering select Cybertruck drivers a free, one-year trial of its Supervised Full Self-Driving package, effectively turning the angular stainless-steel wedge into a rolling billboard for the company’s most advanced software. The offer is targeted, not universal, and it specifically calls out the Cybertruck (or, in official phrasing, the Tesla Cybertruck) as the beneficiary of this extended access. For those lucky drivers, the company is not just dangling a temporary “Your Full Self-Driving (Supervised) Trial,” it is handing them a year-long pass to Supervised Full Self, Driv features that other owners are still weighing against their monthly budgets, a strategy detailed in Tesla’s outreach to Cybertruck owners.
From my vantage point in a more ordinary Tesla, that one-year Cybertruck deal looks like the VIP lounge of autonomy. I am hustling to rack up as many supervised miles as possible before my trial expires, while some Tesla Cybertruck driver is out there letting Supervised Full Self, Driv handle school runs, road trips, and late-night taco quests for an entire year. It is clever marketing, of course: if you want to showcase your most futuristic software, you put it in your most futuristic-looking vehicle and let it roam highways where everyone can see it working. But it also raises the stakes for the rest of us, because the more Tesla leans on these extended trials, the more pressure there is on the system to behave like a polished product rather than a science experiment with cupholders.
Living With a System That Is Powerful, Beta, and Very Needy
Spending real time with Full Self-Driving (Supervised) quickly cures any illusion that the car is actually driving itself. However advanced the software feels when it glides through a complex intersection, the reality is that the current FSD package remains in beta testing, and Tesla is explicit that it does not make the car autonomous. The company’s own guidance stresses that drivers must stay alert, keep their hands ready, and be prepared to immediately take control, a warning that is not just boilerplate but a core part of how the system is supposed to be used. In other words, however impressive FSD looks on a clean stretch of road, the official line is clear: However, FSD from Tesla is still an assistant, not a chauffeur, and Hum drivers like me are expected to babysit it every second it is active, a point spelled out in Tesla’s explanation of its self-driving features.
On the road, that translates into a strangely intense form of relaxation. My hands are light on the wheel, my feet are off the pedals, and yet my brain is working harder than it does when I drive manually, scanning for the moment FSD might misread a lane line or get confused by a construction zone. The car will confidently signal, change lanes, and adjust speed, but I am always half a heartbeat away from snapping it back to manual control. It is like teaching a teenager to drive, except the teenager is a neural network that never sleeps and occasionally decides that a perfectly normal merge lane is a philosophical puzzle. The beta label is not just a legal shield, it is a fair description of how the system feels: astonishing when it works, slightly exhausting when it does not, and always in need of a human chaperone.
The Mad Max Reputation and the Reality in My Lane
Part of the drama around FSD comes from its reputation, which has been shaped as much by its more aggressive settings as by its everyday behavior. Tesla’s software has included a “Mad Max” driving mode that pushes lane changes and passing decisions closer to the edge of what most people consider polite, and that has drawn scrutiny from regulators, insurers, and anyone who has ever clenched their jaw in the fast lane. Critics point out that Tesla’s FSD, even with features like Mad Max mode, does not make vehicles autonomous, and that the branding can blur the line between assistance and autonomy in ways that worry safety experts. Yet, as investigations and reviews of Tesla’s FSD multiply, insurance professionals are increasingly focused on how these features might encourage drivers to overestimate what the system can safely handle, a concern highlighted in reporting on how Mad Max mode blurs that line.
From behind my own wheel, the reality is less cinematic and more fussy. Even when I nudge the settings toward the assertive side, FSD spends as much time hesitating behind cautious drivers as it does darting into open gaps. It will occasionally surge into a lane change with a confidence that makes me tighten my grip, but just as often it will back off a maneuver that any seasoned human would complete without a second thought. The “Mad Max” label oversells the drama; what I experience is more like “Overcaffeinated Intern,” eager to impress but still figuring out office politics. The scrutiny is warranted, because the stakes are high, yet the day-to-day feel of the system is less about reckless aggression and more about the awkward learning curve of a tool that is still trying to understand how humans actually drive.
Why I Keep Turning FSD On Anyway
For all the caveats, I keep reaching for that stalk and letting Full Self-Driving (Supervised) take over whenever the road gives me even a slim excuse. Part of it is simple curiosity: this is one of the most ambitious consumer software projects on the road, and having it in my car, even temporarily, feels like being handed early access to the next operating system for transportation. The trial structure nudges me to use it constantly, to see how it handles rush hour, late-night empty streets, and the chaos of a Saturday at the mall. Every smooth lane change and correctly handled unprotected left turn feels like a glimpse of what a more mature version of this technology could become, while every awkward hesitation is a reminder of how far it still has to go.
The other reason is more practical. Even in its beta state, FSD can take the edge off long drives and tedious commutes, turning me from an active driver into a highly engaged supervisor. That is not the autonomy fantasy Tesla’s marketing sometimes flirts with, but it is still a meaningful shift in how it feels to spend an hour in traffic. The company’s decision to roll out a broad “Your Full Self-Driving (Supervised) Trial” and to hand some Cybertruck owners a full year of Supervised Full Self, Driv access signals that Tesla is betting heavily on drivers like me discovering that once we have lived with this level of assistance, it is hard to go back. I am not ready to hand over the keys to the algorithm, and the law does not let me even if I wanted to, but as long as the trial clock is running, I will keep giving the software every chance to prove it deserves a permanent place in my daily routine.
More from Steel Horse Rides: