General Motors is quietly rewriting the rulebook on its flagship truck engine, and the fix is sitting right on the dipstick. After a wave of failures in its 6.2-liter L87 V8, the company is telling owners to run thicker oil, a move that undercuts years of marketing around ultra-thin factory fills and long change intervals. The real story is not just about a new viscosity label, but about what happens when efficiency targets collide with the brutal reality inside a hot aluminum block.
The recall covers a long list of full-size rigs from Chevy GMC and Cadillac, and it is already reshaping how enthusiasts think about “just follow the manual” maintenance. On paper, the change sounds simple: swap to a heavier oil and update the cap so nobody forgets. In practice, it is an admission that the original lubrication strategy left too little margin when drivers towed hard, idled long, or simply racked up miles in the real world.
What went wrong inside GM’s 6.2-liter V8
The L87 version of GM’s 6.2 V8 was supposed to be the crown jewel of its truck lineup, pairing big power with cylinder deactivation and tight emissions tuning. Instead, owners of late-model Chevy GMC and Cadillac trucks and SUVs started reporting engines that lost oil pressure or simply quit, sometimes with little warning. Legal filings describe how affected 6.2 engines could suffer internal damage that spiraled into catastrophic failure, a pattern that pushed General Motors into a formal recall and a search for a mechanical remedy.
According to defect allegations summarized in one recall analysis, the problem centers on how the lubrication system behaves under load, especially when the engine is hot and oil is thinned out. Thin factory-fill viscosity, long change intervals, and complex hardware like the oil pump and active fuel management hardware created a narrow operating window. Once varnish, wear, or heat pushed the system outside that window, the engine could lose pressure and, in some cases, jump straight to catastrophic engine failure without warning.
Why GM is moving to thicker oil
Faced with mounting failures, General Motors has now updated its recall remedy to specify a thicker motor oil for the 6.2. Internal data cited in technical discussions point to more than 28,000 engine failures tied to the original setup, a number large enough to force a rethink of the entire lubrication strategy. By stepping up to a higher viscosity, GM is effectively trading a sliver of fuel economy and cold-flow efficiency for a bigger safety margin when the engine is hot, loaded, and spinning at highway speeds.
The company’s own messaging now leans on that thicker oil as the primary mechanical fix, backed up by updated caps and documentation so owners and quick-lube shops do not pour in the old spec by habit. In a recent service update, General Motors described a small but important change to the recall procedure: dealers must install a new oil cap that clearly lists the revised viscosity and verify that the oil in the crankcase matches that label, a detail highlighted in an official reel. It is a low-tech solution, but it acknowledges that the original thin-oil strategy left too little room for heat, wear, and real-world abuse.
The bigger lesson about “factory spec” oil
For owners, the most uncomfortable takeaway is that simply following the original owner’s manual was not enough to keep some of these engines alive. The recall has become a case study in how aggressively thin oils, chosen to hit lab-cycle fuel economy targets, can backfire when they meet heavy towing, long idling, or hot climates. One technical breakdown of the situation argues that the GM campaign is a warning shot against blindly trusting the thinnest allowed viscosity, especially in high-output engines like the 6.2 that live hard lives in trucks and SUVs, a point driven home in a detailed oil analysis of the recall.
That same teardown perspective stresses that oil choice should be treated as a tuning decision, not a fixed commandment. The recall on the 6.2 shows how a spec that looks fine in certification testing can turn fragile once engines age, tolerances open up, and drivers push their rigs. By moving to a thicker oil, GM is effectively admitting that the original balance between efficiency and durability was off, and that real-world protection has to win. For owners of these trucks, and really for anyone running a hard-working V8, the message is clear: factory guidance is a starting point, but the real safeguard is choosing an oil that can survive the heat, load, and mileage the engine actually sees.
More from Wilder Media Group: