Lexus has spent years promising a future where drivers steer with a compact yoke and fingertip controls that slide to wherever their hands naturally rest. On paper, the company’s “shiftable” steering wheel controls sound like a clever fix for the awkward ergonomics that doomed earlier yoke experiments. In practice, early drives suggest the hardware, software, and human habits have not yet aligned to make this system feel as intuitive as the brochure implies.
How Lexus’ steer-by-wire vision is supposed to work
Lexus built its new steering concept around a steer-by-wire system that decouples the wheel from the front axle and replaces the traditional round rim with a yoke-style controller. The idea is that, because the steering ratio can change electronically, the driver never needs to cross arms, so the yoke can stay in roughly the same orientation while turning. That stable orientation then allows Lexus to mount touch-sensitive switches and toggles on the yoke and have their virtual functions “follow” the driver’s thumbs as the wheel moves, so volume, cruise, and drive-mode controls are always under hand instead of rotating away like on a conventional wheel. Early technical briefings on the system describe how the steer-by-wire unit in models such as the RZ 450e is designed to keep steering inputs within about 150 degrees of lock, which is what makes the fixed-hand-position concept feasible in the first place, according to Lexus’ own steer-by-wire overview.
To make that vision work, Lexus layers in a digital interface that maps each physical button to a specific function on the central display, so drivers can see what their thumbs will trigger before pressing. In demonstrations of the “One Motion Grip” system, the company shows a head-up display and instrument cluster that highlight icons around the yoke, indicating where functions like lane-keeping assist, audio track skip, and phone controls sit at any given moment. The promise is that, once configured, the controls will feel like an extension of the driver’s hands, with the software adjusting for steering angle so the same thumb movement always calls up the same feature, a behavior Lexus details in its RZ technology brief.
Where the clever idea runs into real-world drivers
On the road, reviewers have found that the theory of always-available controls collides with the reality of how people actually grip a steering device. Test drives of the Lexus RZ with the yoke report that drivers often shift their hands slightly during quick maneuvers or low-speed parking, which can leave thumbs misaligned with the expected control zones. When the system assumes a fixed hand position but the driver does not maintain it, the “floating” virtual buttons can feel like they jump around, forcing the driver to glance at the display to confirm what each press will do, as described in early RZ drive impressions that highlight the learning curve of the One Motion Grip setup.
Even when drivers adapt, the combination of a short steering ratio and sensitive touch controls can make the system feel twitchy in tight spaces. Reports from European market tests note that at low speeds, small steering inputs translate into relatively large changes in wheel angle, which can be disorienting when combined with the need to avoid brushing unintended buttons on the yoke. Some reviewers have also flagged that the haptic feedback and on-screen prompts, meant to reassure the driver, can instead add cognitive load, since the driver must process steering feel, visual cues, and vibration patterns at once, a concern echoed in evaluations of the RZ’s UK-spec steer-by-wire system.
Ergonomics, safety, and what Lexus may need to change
Beyond day-to-day annoyance, ergonomics experts and safety advocates are watching how shiftable controls interact with driver attention. Because the system relies heavily on screens and context-sensitive icons, there is a risk that drivers spend more time checking what a button will do than simply performing the action by muscle memory. Early assessments of the RZ’s cabin note that while the central touchscreen and head-up display are crisp, the dependence on visual confirmation for steering-wheel functions can pull eyes away from the road longer than traditional stalks or fixed buttons, a tradeoff highlighted in interior reviews of the 2023 RZ 450e.
Regulators are also scrutinizing steer-by-wire systems because they remove the mechanical link that drivers have relied on for more than a century. Lexus has emphasized that its setup includes multiple redundant motors, backup power, and fail-safe modes that revert to a conventional steering ratio if the steer-by-wire control unit detects a fault. Technical documentation for the system describes layered safeguards and a steering feel tuned to mimic the weight and feedback of a hydraulic rack, even though the connection is electronic, as outlined in Lexus’ advanced driver-assistance materials. Those protections may satisfy safety standards, but they do not solve the core usability issue that many testers report: the driver must learn a new steering technique and a new control layout at the same time.
For Lexus, the path forward likely involves giving drivers more choice and more gradual change. Some markets already offer the RZ with a conventional round wheel and fixed controls, and early feedback suggests that pairing steer-by-wire with a familiar rim shape reduces the sense of disorientation while still allowing Lexus to experiment with variable ratios and software-defined steering feel, according to regional specifications listed in the European RZ product guide. If the company can decouple the promising aspects of steer-by-wire from the more polarizing yoke and shiftable buttons, it may yet deliver on the elegant idea that first sold this system: controls that truly move with the driver, instead of asking the driver to move toward the technology.
More from Steel Horse Rides: