New research into onboard tap water is challenging one of the quiet assumptions of air travel, finding that some airlines are far more likely than others to serve water that has been contaminated in transit. The latest Airline Water Study points to wide gaps in how carriers manage their tanks, trucks, and hoses, with consequences that reach from the galley coffee pot to the bathroom sink. For passengers, the findings turn a routine drink of water into a calculated health decision at 35,000 feet.
Instead of a single industry standard, the study describes a patchwork of practices that leave some travelers at higher risk of exposure to coliform bacteria and other organisms depending on which logo is on their boarding pass. The results reward a handful of airlines with top Water Safety Scores while effectively warning passengers away from tap water, coffee, and tea on others.
How the Airline Water Study Tested What Comes Out of the Tap
The Airline Water Study, referenced across several reports, set out to quantify how safe it really is to drink or wash with water that comes from aircraft tanks rather than sealed bottles. Researchers evaluated water quality over a multi‑year period, looking at contamination levels in the tanks that feed galley faucets, coffee makers, and lavatory taps. One analysis describes how the project ranked the quality of water provided in onboard tanks during a three year period starting in October, then compared airlines using a scorecard that translated lab results into consumer friendly grades, a framework echoed in coverage of how a study ranks water safety across several airlines.
To make those rankings meaningful, the researchers built a Water Safety Score system that weighs contamination findings, frequency of testing, and how often airlines disinfect their systems. The Center for Food as Medicine & Longevity describes how its 2026 Center for Food as Medicine & Longevity Airline Water Study converted those lab results into Water Safety Scores that resemble school report cards, with Grade A and B ratings signaling relatively safer water and lower scores flagging airlines where contamination was more common.
The Scorecard: Delta’s Perfect Mark and Frontier’s Near Miss
One of the most striking findings is that a few airlines manage to deliver consistently clean water even within the constraints of airport infrastructure and tight turnarounds. A detailed breakdown of the results notes that Delta Air Lines received a perfect score of 5, an A grade that set it apart from competitors, while Frontier came close with a score of 4.8 on the same scale. Those numbers, drawn from 35,000 tests, suggest that rigorous maintenance and monitoring can keep contamination rates low even in a challenging operating environment.
The Center for Food as Medicine & Longevity reinforces that picture, listing Delta Air Lines among the major carriers receiving the highest Water Safety Scores and explicitly assigning it a 5.0, while also highlighting that some regional airlines achieved a Grade A or B despite operating smaller fleets. In its summary of the 2026 Center for Food as Medicine & Longevity Airline Water Study, the organization notes that Delta Air Lines sits at the top of the table, underscoring that strong performance is possible and that poor water quality is not an inevitable feature of flying.
The “Shame on You” Airlines and What Drives Their Low Scores
At the other end of the spectrum, the same research identifies carriers whose water systems repeatedly tested positive for coliform bacteria, earning them failing grades and even a so‑called “Shame on You” label. The Newswise summary of the Airline Water Study explains that the project not only ranked airlines but also singled out the worst performers with a tongue in cheek award that draws attention to systemic problems in how some fleets handle their tanks, trucks, carts, and hoses. That critique is embedded in the study’s findings, which are laid out in a section describing the “Shame on You” Award and the operational lapses that can lead to contamination.
Earlier reporting on airline water quality shows that this is not a new problem. A prior study of U.S. carriers found that only three of eleven major airlines and a minority of regional airlines scored 3 or higher on a five point scale, the threshold the researchers considered safe enough to drink. That analysis highlighted how Alaska Airlines and Allegiant were top performers while some carriers scored as low as 1 out of 5, and it noted that Piedmont Airlines was the highest scoring regional airline. The same report urged passengers to avoid coffee or tea served on board lower scoring airlines, advice that is captured in a Study that framed the issue as a basic safety concern rather than a matter of taste.
What the Center for Food as Medicine & Longevity Found in 2026
The 2026 Center for Food as Medicine & Longevity Airline Water Study builds on that earlier work with a broader health lens, connecting water quality to food safety and long term wellness. Its authors emphasize that contaminated water on planes is not just an inconvenience but a potential vector for gastrointestinal illness, particularly for passengers with weakened immune systems, older adults, and young children. In summarizing its methodology and results, the Center explains that it evaluated both major and regional airlines, then assigned Water Safety Scores that translate complex lab data into a simple A through F style grading system, a framework detailed in its Water Safety Scores overview.
One of the more alarming findings is the rate at which some airlines’ water samples tested positive for total coliform bacteria, with the Center citing positivity rates that reached as high as 33.33% in certain fleets. That figure means that roughly one in three samples from those carriers showed evidence of contamination, a level that would be unacceptable in most municipal water systems. The Center’s summary of its 2026 Center for Food as Medicine & Longevity Airline Water Study notes that when an aircraft’s water sample fails, the airline is expected to take corrective action, but the persistence of high positivity rates suggests that some operators are not disinfecting or flushing their systems often enough to keep up with microbial growth.
Why Experts Now Prefer Hand Sanitizer to Airplane Tap Water
Health experts who reviewed the latest Airline Water Study have translated its technical findings into blunt advice for travelers. One widely shared analysis argues that passengers should treat airplane tap water as a last resort and instead rely on alcohol based hand sanitizer and sealed bottled water whenever possible. In that piece, writer Alesandra Dubin explains that the 2026 Airline Water Study prompted specialists to recommend hand sanitizer with at least 60% alcohol for use in airplane bathrooms, since it avoids the risk of washing with contaminated tap water, a recommendation laid out in a Creator report on why sanitizer is now considered safer than the sink.
Travel industry analysts have echoed that message, advising passengers to think carefully before accepting coffee or tea that was brewed with tank water. One commentary on the study’s findings goes so far as to tell readers to NEVER drink any water onboard that is not in a sealed bottle, and to avoid coffee and tea entirely, arguing that the risk of exposure to coliform bacteria is not worth the convenience. That stark warning, which uses the word NEVER in capital letters, reflects a growing consensus among experts that the safest approach is to treat airplane tap water as nonpotable unless an airline has demonstrated consistently high scores.
How Regulators Try to Keep Aircraft Water Safe
Behind the scenes, federal regulators do have rules that are supposed to keep aircraft drinking water safe, but the Airline Water Study suggests that compliance and enforcement are uneven. The Environmental Protection Agency oversees the Aircraft Drinking Water Rule, which sets standards for how airlines must monitor, disinfect, and report on the water they serve on board. That rule requires periodic sampling and corrective actions when contamination is detected, and it is described in detail in the EPA’s Aircraft Drinking Water Rule guidance, which treats each aircraft as a public water system subject to federal oversight.
Historical investigations show why those regulations exist. In one documented case, Two aircraft were found to have E. coli bacteria in their drinking water, prompting regulators to expand Testing to 169 planes at twenty airports to understand the scope of the problem. That episode, recounted in a medical history of aviation hygiene, illustrates how contamination can slip through if airlines do not rigorously follow disinfection schedules and if regulators do not maintain pressure on carriers to comply, a dynamic explored in an analysis of the problem with drinking water on airplanes.
Which Airlines Come Out Ahead, and Which Fall Behind
For passengers trying to make sense of the rankings, the latest coverage provides a clearer picture of which airlines are more likely to deliver safe tap water. A recent overview of U.S. carriers explains that researchers developed a scorecard for 10 major and 11 regional airlines, then assigned grades based on contamination levels, testing frequency, and the presence of organisms such as E. coli. In that analysis, one major airline scored 3.85 (grade B), while others clustered lower on the scale, a breakdown summarized in a report on how US airlines ranked for onboard water safety.
Another account of the same study emphasizes that the rankings carry a specific warning for coffee drinkers, since the same water that feeds the lavatory taps is often used to brew hot beverages. That piece notes that the scorecard considered not only the presence of coliform bacteria but also the detection of other organisms and E. coli, reinforcing that the risk is microbiological rather than cosmetic. The report, which describes how US airlines ranked for onboard water safety by new study, underscores that even airlines with midrange scores may still have occasional contamination events that justify caution.
What This Means for Coffee, Tea, and In‑Flight Habits
The practical implications of these findings are most visible in the galley, where flight attendants brew coffee and tea using water drawn from the aircraft’s tanks. A detailed news analysis on whether it is safe to drink coffee on a plane explains that the Airline Water Study found wide variation in water quality, leading experts to advise against consuming hot drinks on airlines with low or middling scores. That report, which asks Should passengers drink tea and coffee on a flight and concludes that the answer depends heavily on the carrier’s water ranking, is captured in a feature on airline drinking water quality and safety.
Consumer advocates have taken that message a step further, urging travelers to bring their own sealed bottled water and to use hand sanitizer instead of washing with tap water in the lavatory whenever possible. The Center for Food as Medicine & Longevity’s guidance is explicit: to be extra safe, passengers should NEVER drink any water onboard that is not in a sealed bottle and should avoid coffee or tea entirely, advice spelled out in its recommendations for extra safety. Combined with the study’s rankings, that guidance effectively shifts the default in favor of skepticism about any beverage that starts in an aircraft tank.
How Airlines Like Alaska, JetBlue, and Spirit Fit Into the Picture
Individual airline brands are now being viewed through the lens of these water safety scores, with some carriers working to reassure passengers that they take the issue seriously. Alaska Airlines, which has previously been cited as a top performer in water quality rankings, highlights its broader commitment to customer service and operational reliability on its official site, where travelers can review policies and book flights through the main Alaska Airlines portal. While the latest Airline Water Study focuses on lab results rather than marketing, the juxtaposition of strong scores and a reputation for reliability reinforces Alaska’s positioning as a relatively safer choice for passengers concerned about tap water.
Other major carriers that did not receive top marks are facing more scrutiny. JetBlue, for example, was noted in one analysis as receiving a lower grade in earlier testing, and its official site now sits alongside independent scorecards that many travelers consult before booking. Passengers can still manage their reservations and check in through the main JetBlue website, but some may now pair that convenience with a personal rule to stick to sealed beverages on board. Ultra low cost carriers are also part of the conversation, with Spirit Airlines’ official Spirit site offering low fares that appeal to budget travelers even as independent water studies encourage those same passengers to bring their own bottled water and sanitizer to manage the added health risk.
Why the Findings Matter for the Future of Flying
The Airline Water Study’s most important contribution may be its ability to turn a hidden systems issue into a visible consumer choice. By assigning clear Water Safety Scores and highlighting both high performers like Delta Air Lines and lower scoring carriers that earned a “Shame on You” label, the research gives passengers leverage to reward airlines that invest in cleaner tanks, trucks, carts, and hoses. The Newswise summary of the Airline Water Study notes that Here are the study’s findings in a way that makes those differences easy to compare, a clarity that is reflected in its Airline Water Study overview.
At the same time, the study’s authors and health experts are careful to stress that no scorecard can substitute for basic precautions. They continue to advise passengers to favor sealed bottled water, to use alcohol based hand sanitizer instead of lavatory taps, and to think twice before accepting coffee or tea on airlines that do not have an A or B grade. Those recommendations, echoed in the Center for Food as Medicine & Longevity’s guidance and in travel industry commentary, suggest that until contamination rates fall across the board, the safest approach is to assume that some airlines are more likely than others to serve contaminated water and to adjust in‑flight habits accordingly.
More from Wilder Media Group: