Sticker prices grab attention, but the real money question with any car is what it quietly drains from a bank account over a decade. Put a Tesla next to a Toyota and the upfront numbers can look wildly different, yet long term, fuel, maintenance, and resale value often flip the script. Over ten years, the gap between an electric and a gas car is less about brand loyalty and more about how each dollar of “total cost of ownership” actually behaves.
Looking past the showroom lights, the comparison comes down to a few big buckets: what the car loses in value, what it costs to keep running, and how much energy it burns. When those pieces are stacked side by side, the Tesla-versus-Toyota debate stops being theoretical and turns into a surprisingly specific math problem.
How total cost of ownership really works
Car people love to argue about reliability, but the quiet heavyweight in any long term budget is depreciation. One long running analysis of owner costs spells it out bluntly, noting that Depreciation is the largest cost factor by far, often dwarfing what drivers spend on fuel or repairs. That is why a cheaper car can still be more expensive to own if it sheds value quickly, and why a higher priced model can quietly win the decade long money game if it holds its price on the used market.
Researchers who dug into the most popular models in the country found the same pattern when they compared the Comparing the Total in the United States. On Page 4, the report breaks out a typical Sedan and notes that The EV is slightly cheaper to own than its gas twin once purchase price, depreciation, fuel, and maintenance are all rolled together. In other words, the headline price is only the opening bid; the ten year bill is written by how the car ages and what it costs to keep it moving.
Purchase price versus long term savings
On day one, a Tesla usually looks pricier than a comparable Toyota, and that upfront gap is what scares off a lot of shoppers. Guidance aimed at new EV buyers leans into that reality, pointing out that While the initial purchase price may be higher than their gas powered counterparts, many EV owners enjoy long term savings once fuel and upkeep are factored in, savings that can, in many cases, surpass the initial. That framing is exactly where Tesla tends to live: higher buy in, lower running costs.
One detailed comparison of popular models in the United States backs that up, showing that when a mainstream Sedan is offered in both gas and electric form, The EV version ends up slightly cheaper to own over the full cycle once all the usual expenses are tallied in the United States market. That is the basic Tesla pitch in spreadsheet form: pay more now, then let electricity, simpler hardware, and slower wear and tear quietly pay the driver back.
Fuel and energy: gas versus electrons
Fuel is where the Tesla versus Toyota story gets very concrete. In a widely shared breakdown of a Toyota Corolla versus a Tesla Model 3 over 10 years, creator Morine assumed a typical commute and current energy prices and then simply added up the receipts. For the sake of the comparison, For the exercise, the Toyota Corolla was estimated to burn through $10,333 in gas over a decade. Well, how does an extra $5,000 sound when that is stacked against home charging costs for the Tesla Model 3, which came in roughly that much lower on energy spend alone.
The same story plays out when analysts zoom out from one driveway to the broader market. One detailed look at EV ownership notes that While the initial price can be higher, no gas and lower per mile energy costs are a big part of why EVs often come out ahead, especially as electricity prices are more stable than pump prices in many regions, a point underscored by an electric car savings. In that light, the Corolla’s $10,333 in gas looks less like a necessary evil and more like a premium paid for the convenience of filling up anywhere.
Maintenance: where Tesla quietly undercuts Toyota
Maintenance is where the conversation gets counterintuitive. Toyota has built its reputation on low running costs, yet a recent Study comparing brands found that Tesla leads with the lowest ownership cost and actually beats Toyota on out of pocket spending, with the analysis framed squarely around Tesla and Toyota. That same research notes that Teslas are less expensive to maintain than other car brands, including some with strong reputations for reliability, which puts the usual assumptions about Japanese economy cars on their head.
Separate cost breakdowns of Electric vehicles like Teslas back that up with hard numbers, pegging typical Annual maintenance around $500, far below what many gas cars rack up once oil changes, exhaust work, and transmission service are added in, according to a Electric ownership guide. Another analysis of brand level costs over a decade goes even further, with NEWS that Consumer Reports has named Teslathe cheapest car brand to maintain over a 10 year period, listing Tesla at $4,035 and Buick at $4,900 for the same window, figures that show how far EV maintenance has fallen compared with traditional brands like Buick.
Depreciation and resale value
Depreciation is the wildcard that can erase all those fuel and maintenance savings if a car falls out of favor. A broad study of resale performance notes that Even Tesla’s Model 3, with the lowest rate of depreciation among electric vehicles, is over 10% higher than the industry average, a reminder that EVs as a group still lag the best gas models on holding value even when a standout Model is singled out. That gap matters, because a car that loses value faster forces its owner to absorb a bigger hit when it is time to sell or trade in.
Zooming in on SUVs, the Tesla Model Y offers a more sobering snapshot. After three years, an Tesla Model Y sees a depreciation of 56.1 percent with a resale value of $26,337, and Its 7 year depreciation is reported at more than four fifths of the original price in one Tesla Model breakdown. Toyota’s long history of slow and steady resale is not spelled out in the same detail in these sources, but the broader pattern is clear: Tesla’s low maintenance and fuel bills are partially offset by steeper value loss, while Toyota leans on its reputation to keep more of its price tag intact.
More from Wilder Media Group: