You’re likely already weighing how the upcoming pay-per-mile change will affect your wallet, charging habits, and choice of car. Electric and plug-in hybrid drivers will face a per-mile charge (3p/mile for EVs, 1.5p/mile for plug-in hybrids) from April 2028, so you should expect a clear, predictable increase in running costs tied directly to how much you drive.
This shift aims to recoup lost fuel duty as more vehicles go electric, and it will change how people compare total ownership costs, the value of home charging, and decisions about shorter commutes or car choice. The article breaks down how the new charges work, who pays what, and practical steps you can take to manage or reduce the impact.
New Pay-Per-Mile Charges and Tax Changes Explained
The government will move electric vehicles onto a distance-based charge and update road tax rules for plug-in models. Drivers should expect a fixed per-mile rate, continued annual Vehicle Excise Duty (VED) in many cases, and a simple mileage reporting and reconciliation process.
The 3p Per Mile Rate for Electric Vehicles
The Treasury confirmed a 3p per mile charge for battery electric vehicles (BEVs) from April 2028. This pence-per-mile rate is designed to replace some lost fuel duty revenue while keeping running costs lower than equivalent petrol or diesel cars for most drivers.
Owners will still pay routine VED where applicable, so total annual tax equals VED plus the 3p/mile charge. For a driver covering 8,500 miles a year, the eVED bill at 3p/mile would add about £255. That payment is separate from insurer or charging costs and is aimed at aligning EV contributions to road upkeep with combustion-engine drivers.
How Pay-Per-Mile Works for Plug-In Hybrids
Plug-in hybrid vehicles (PHEVs) face a reduced per-mile rate of 1.5p where the government applies eVED to them. The lower rate reflects PHEVs’ mixed use of electricity and petrol and aims to avoid double-taxing short electric trips while capturing a share of road-funding from electrified mileage.
PHEV owners must report total annual miles; fuel consumption for petrol miles remains separately subject to fuel duty. For drivers who predominantly use electric mode, the 1.5p rate will reduce the distance-based charge, but overall costs also depend on how often the car switches to petrol and on VED banding.
Electric Vehicle Excise Duty (eVED) and Road Tax Updates
The new system, officially called eVED, layers a distance-based levy on top of existing VED where rules require it. The change ends broad VED exemptions once enjoyed by many EVs and creates two parallel charges: the per-mile fee (3p or 1.5p) and any annual VED that still applies.
Rates will be indexed to inflation in future years, meaning the real cost can rise. The measure intends to treat all vehicles more equally for road wear and public revenue. Policymakers state company car arrangements and salary sacrifice schemes will have specific administrative provisions to handle eVED within employer setups.
Reporting Mileage and Payment Process
Mileage verification relies on existing MOT records for most cars and on scheduled checks for newer vehicles to avoid GPS tracking. Drivers will estimate annual miles at renewal, pay an upfront charge (with monthly or annual options), then reconcile at year-end against MOT-verified mileage.
If a driver underestimates miles, a balancing payment will be due; overestimates generate a credit for the following year. The system emphasises privacy and uses odometer reads rather than location data. For details on the official announcement and implementation timeline, consult the government coverage of the change.
The Impact of Pay-Per-Mile EV Taxes on Drivers and the Market
Pay-per-mile charges change who pays for roads, how much drivers budget for travel, and how automakers price vehicles and options. They affect daily commute costs, long-distance travel decisions, and the relative cost gap between electric vehicles and internal combustion engine cars.
Financial Effects for EV and Hybrid Owners
A per-mile fee turns a hidden fuel-tax benefit into a visible line item on bills. Owners who drive 12,000 miles per year would pay roughly $276 at 2.3 cents per mile — similar to some proposals — or they may choose fixed annual alternatives where offered.
Rural drivers typically pay more under mileage fees because they cover longer distances; urban drivers may pay less but face higher parking and congestion costs. Hybrids and plug-in hybrids complicate fairness: they still use some fuel but often drive many electric miles, so blended accounting or separate tiers usually emerge.
States and countries often pair mileage fees with registration adjustments or rebates to avoid double-charging. That changes the effective operating cost that buyers use when comparing an electric car against a diesel or petrol model. Incentives like an electric car grant may be retooled to offset new running costs and keep EV purchase prices competitive.
Influence on EV Adoption and Sales Trends
Visible per-mile charges can slow EV purchase momentum if buyers see higher lifetime running costs than advertised. Early adopters—commuters with predictable mileage—may absorb fees more easily, while price-sensitive buyers could delay purchases or choose used internal combustion engine cars instead.
Automakers may respond by emphasizing efficiency, larger range, or bundled service plans that include mileage fees in lease deals. That changes marketing and total-cost-of-ownership calculations used by fleet managers and private buyers.
Policy design matters for sales: phased implementation, exemptions for low-income drivers, or credits tied to reduced air pollution can soften negative demand effects. Independent analyses and budget offices often model these impacts to predict shifts in EV market share and state revenues.
Impact on Charging Infrastructure and Running Costs
Per-mile fees change the relative economics of home charging versus public fast charging. Home charging remains cheaper per kWh, so drivers with reliable off-street charging keep lower running costs even after mileage fees. Those relying on public chargers face combined per-mile charges plus higher per-kWh prices at fast stations.
Operators of public chargers might adjust pricing, offering bundled access or subscriptions to compete with mileage-based costs. Investment decisions in charging infrastructure could pivot toward areas with denser EV ownership and predictable usage patterns.
Road-use charges could also influence modal choices: higher car travel costs may nudge some commuters toward public transport for daily trips, reducing congestion and local air pollution. Governments may use revenue from mileage programs to target charging deployment in underserved areas or to fund public transport improvements.
More from Steel Horse Rides: